Rodey Law Firm
 
 
 
 


Rodey Publications

The Industrial Revenue Bond Process in New Mexico

Donald B. Monnheimer, Director
(505) 766-7557
dmonnheimer@rodey.com

Disclaimer: The law and legal rules are subject to continual revision and change. This article is dated March, 2004. No attempt has been made to update this article to reflect pertinent changes or developments in the law, if any, since that date.

Industrial revenue bonds (“IRB’s”) are authorized to be issued by New Mexico municipalities and the counties for the purpose of providing project financing and also for the purpose of allowing projects to qualify for certain tax incentives, including (i) an ad valorem or property tax exemption on all real and personal property constituting the project property and (ii) a gross receipts tax deduction and compensating tax exemption with regard to the acquisition of equipment and other personal property for use in the business to be conducted at the project.

Additionally, certain types of IRBs (primarily for manufacturing facilities) may be issued as tax exempt “qualified small issue bonds” under Section 144(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”). However, a qualified small issue bond may not exceed $10,000,000, inclusive of all capital expenditures made with respect to the facility as provided in the Code and the issuance of such bonds is subject to an allocation under the statewide volume cap by the New Mexico Board of Finance. Under the current policy of the Board of Finance, $13,795,000 is allocated for qualified small issue bonds for 2004.

In today’s low interest rate environment, many IRB transactions are being closed on a taxable basis. This means that instead of the interest on the bonds being exempt from federal income tax, the interest paid on the bonds will be taxable. However, in both cases, the interest on the bonds will be exempt from New Mexico income taxes. Many corporations and other entities are using taxable IRBs so the project financing can be undertaken without compliance with the rigorous requirements for the issue of tax exempt bonds and also because the yield curve currently between tax exempt and taxable obligations does not justify the additional time and expense to meet Code requirements for tax exempt obligations.

Additionally, in the case of corporations and other entities that are able to capitalize their IRB projects from funds on hand or raised separate from the issuance of IRBs, such entities are currently proceeding with what are called “self funded” IRB transactions for the sole purpose of taking advantage of the state tax incentives.

The benefits of the property tax or ad valorem tax exemption are fairly apparent. In short, all real and personal property that qualifies as project property will be exempt from ad valorem or property taxes for as long as the bonds are outstanding provided the project property is subject to a lease with the governmental issuer, not to exceed thirty (30) years. The gross receipts tax deduction and the corresponding compensating or use tax exemption involves a tax structure that is unique to New Mexico. The gross receipts tax is a tax on the gross receipts of an entity that provides goods or services and the tax collector is the vendor of the goods and services. However, in most cases the vendor passes the tax on to the recipient of the goods and services so that when goods are acquired in the state of New Mexico, the seller of the goods will add the gross receipts tax amount to the purchase price of the goods and the vendor will then remit the gross receipts tax to the State in a report that is required to be filed monthly. The current gross receipts tax rate in Albuquerque is 5.8125%. The compensating or use tax (at a slightly lower rate than the gross receipts tax) is a tax on the transactions that would be subject to the gross receipts tax if the transaction or sale occurred in the State of New Mexico. This would apply when a company acquires equipment for a facility from an out of state vendor and the equipment is then delivered to the purchaser and used by the purchaser in the State. Under the law, the purchaser is obligated to pay the tax directly to the State and to submit a report with regard to the transaction. The gross receipts tax and compensating or use tax exemption is usually considered to be the benefit of greatest value in the initial development of an IRB facility within the State.

An IRB transaction is commenced by the user of a proposed facility making application to a municipality or a county, providing certain information necessary for the governmental entity to make a preliminary assessment of the project, including in some instances, the preparation of a cost benefit and feasibility analysis to determine the overall benefit of the project in terms of jobs and tax revenues generated versus the tax benefits or subsidies provided, that are treated as costs or charges to the governmental entity. Assuming the basic economics of the project are satisfactory to the local municipality or county, such entity often will adopt an inducement or reimbursement resolution providing a non binding statement of the governmental entity’s intent to proceed with the project and issuance of bonds. Assuming the necessary financing is obtained by the project user and the transaction documents are prepared, at closing, all real and/or personal property comprising the IRB project will be deeded or otherwise conveyed to the IRB issuer, which the issuer then simultaneously leases back to the IRB user (or company) for the term of the bonds, with the company being obligated to purchase the project for a nominal sum when the bond matures or at the time of early redemption of the bonds. It is the responsibility of the IRB user to obtain financing for the project based on its own credit (or credit enhancement it provides), and the governmental entity, by law, cannot provide any credit support to advance the project except as authorized under the Local Economic Development Act (which should be addressed separately). The lease arrangement under which the project property is owned by the governmental entity allows the project property to be treated as property owned by the governmental entity, which under New Mexico law and the constitution allows the property to be exempt from ad valorem or property taxation and also permits the purchase of depreciable tangible personal property that is part of the IRB project and purchased with bond proceeds to be deductible from gross receipts tax and exempt from the compensating or use tax.

It was mentioned above that certain corporations and other entities may choose to use IRBs only to qualify for the tax incentives available under New Mexico law. In that situation, an IRB can be issued as part of a self funded transaction, meaning that the financial wherewithal to “fund” the IRB would actually come from the project user (“parent”) or a related entity. In this scenario, the IRB would be “purchased” by an affiliate of the parent that will build and operate the IRB project, and the funds necessary to acquire the IRB can actually be transferred from the parent entity to the affiliate and then back to the parent via the trustee, provided proper recordkeeping is maintained as to the flow of monies that constitute bond proceeds. Generally, a financial institution with trust powers will act as a trustee or depository and provide recordkeeping of the funds that are received from the affiliate and then applied through a requisition or draw by the parent in providing financing for the project. The monies that are made available to the affiliate (in order to fund the bond) can come directly from the parent or from a third party lender that provides funds based upon the financial wherewithal of the affiliate or a guarantee of the parent. This scenario would give the project owner the greatest degree of control over the timing of all aspects of the IRB transaction, and would permit the necessary bond documents to be drawn on terms and conditions that would be favorable to the parent subject, of course, to the requirements imposed by the municipality or county issuer of the IRBs.

Generally, a wide variety of business activities would constitute qualified “projects” under the IRB legislation, including (i) manufacturing, processing or assembling of any agricultural or manufactured project; (ii) any commercial enterprise in storing, warehousing, distributing or selling products of agriculture, mining or industry, but not including facilities for the sale of goods or commodities that retail; (iii) any business involving the supplying of services to the general public, but excluding the sale of goods or commodities that retail; (iv) any electric generation facility other than one for which both a location approval and certificate of convenience and necessity are required prior to commencing construction or operation under the New Mexico Public Utility Act and the Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act of 1999; and (v) any 501(c)(3) corporation.

The foregoing discussion provides only general information regarding IRBs in New Mexico and, as an overview, necessarily simplifies the legal issues that are involved in using IRBs for a particular project. Additionally, the law and rules involving the issuance of IRBs in New Mexico are subject to change from time to time and any business entity interested in using IRBs is advised to engage its own legal counsel to provide advice concerning the facts and circumstances of a particular project.

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Copyright © 2003-2009 Rodey, Dickason, Sloan Akin, & Robb, PA

 
 website design by Teknea Design